Woody what you said was incorrect!!!
On facebook, miz "liked" the group "Swan for Brownlow"
So I commented on it saying "He has as much chance of winning it as Carrazzo"... which began as a figure of speech say to speak...
Me and Miz had our usual facebook blanter in which I come here to see that there was a thread with the options of Swan AND Carrazzo to win the brownlow or neither...
Had the thread been Does Swan have a chance of winning the Brownlow... yes or no... there it would've been a more accurate thread depicting what we were discussing... but having Carrazzo as an option was obviously a tactical way to get the people skimming through the thread off guard and basically laugh at the idea that I was comparing the two...
The idea behind my original argument was to say in a fluorescent type of way that Swan won't win the brownlow...
At the time we were having this facebook argument... Swan was absolutely killing it... hence why the group was born...
Now obviously he had a chance to win the brownlow... however he will always be disadvantaged to others that attract more votes...
I did feel that with all the extra publicity surrounding Swan whislt he was playing that it has to affect the umps votes this time and they can't not notice him...
Then this thread died... only to be bumped some 2 or 3 weeks before the actual Brownlow... for the "lol" factor... now don't get me wrong... I'm the king of tooting my horns too early... but a bump of a thread when it could all prove my point was a laughable act...
To Miz's credit... she has come on here and said "I was right"... and that is all I can ask... this thread can be closed...
Miz 10000 - Gordon 1
Finally
Swan V Carrazzo
Started by mizvrx, Mar 30 2010 03:27 PM
210 replies to this topic
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















