Jump to content


Baker and Johnson incidents


32 replies to this topic

#1 Sean

    Brownlow Medalist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,973 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Werribee
  • Club: Western Bulldogs

Posted 28 June 2010 - 06:00 PM

Quote

St Kilda's Steven Baker faces 12-week ban for strikes on Steve Johnson
Al Paton From: Herald Sun June 28, 2010 5:33PM


St Kilda defender Steven Baker has been whacked with a 12-week suspension after the match review panel delivered its verdict on Friday night's stoush with Cat Steve Johnson.

Baker has been charged with three separate striking offences against Johnson and has also become the first player to be charged with interfering with an injured player.

Baker targetted Johnson's hand after he broke it early in the game.

The suspensions for each offence add up to 12 games. If Baker pleads guilty to each offence he can escape with a nine-week ban, which will see him available for the first week of the finals.

The match review panel's previous heaviest penalty was eight matches for Docker Dean Solomon breaking the jaw of Cat Cameron Ling.

Barry Hall was banned for seven matches for king hitting Brent Staker in 2008.

Johnson has been offered a four-match suspension for two separate striking offences against Baker.

The most serious was elbowing the Saint in the face in the second quarter on Friday night.

The hit forced Baker from the field and he finished the match with a badly swollen eye.

Geelong greats said at the weekend Baker deserved the elbow that Johnson threw back in the second quarter, causing blood to stream from his face.

Johnson's teammate Cameron Mooney has been offered a two-match suspension for striking Saint Jason Blake.

His poor record means he cannot reduce the penalty with a guilty plea.

The match review panel reviewed an incident in which Sam Fisher pushed Geelong midfielder Jimmy Bartel as he left the field with a feared broken arm but ruled there was no case to answer.

In summary, Baker facing 9-12 weeks and Stevie J looking at a month.

Edited by Sean, 28 June 2010 - 06:01 PM.


#2 Part2

    300 Gamer

  • VIP
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 424 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Club: Brisbane

Posted 28 June 2010 - 06:16 PM

Absolute bullshit, to sum it up.

Baker shouldn't have been a dick but all defenders do it and 12 weeks is incredibly excessive. If he doesn't take the early it's the rest of the season for him.
Posted Image

#3 Saint

    AFL Legend

  • VIP
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,379 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Warragul, Victoria
  • Club: St Kilda

Posted 28 June 2010 - 06:50 PM

LOL that's *****ed..

#4 Saint

    AFL Legend

  • VIP
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,379 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Warragul, Victoria
  • Club: St Kilda

Posted 28 June 2010 - 06:50 PM

LOL that's *****ed..

#5 BERBA

    AFL Legend

  • VIP
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,863 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Perth
  • Club: West Coast

Posted 28 June 2010 - 07:21 PM

Hall got 7 for knocking out Staker the way he did.

What a joke.



#6 Henesey

    AFL Legend

  • VIP
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,499 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brisbane
  • Club: Adelaide

Posted 28 June 2010 - 08:10 PM

Well thats a strong message sent from the tribunal that this sort of shit between forwards and defenders won't be tolerated anymore.
Posted Image

#7 Saint

    AFL Legend

  • VIP
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,379 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Warragul, Victoria
  • Club: St Kilda

Posted 28 June 2010 - 08:46 PM

Strong is an understatement. You wouldn't get 12 for kicking a guy in the head.

#8 Henesey

    AFL Legend

  • VIP
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,499 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brisbane
  • Club: Adelaide

Posted 28 June 2010 - 08:47 PM

View PostSaint, on 28 June 2010 - 08:46 PM, said:

Strong is an understatement. You wouldn't get 12 for kicking a guy in the head.
You would most likely be banned for life.

Its 9 weeks with an early plea Saint.
Posted Image

#9 reeflingo

    Collingwood 2010 Premiers

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,419 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sunshine Coast
  • Club: Collingwood

Posted 28 June 2010 - 09:29 PM

All I can do is laugh...HAHA

Matthew Scarlett on the 2010 Prelim against Collingwood:"They just annihilated us early and we were a bit shell-shocked. I’ve played for a while and I’ve never seen a side [apply so much] pressure. They just swarm you and it’s like they’ve got three or four extra players out there. I’ve never seen anything like it.”

Posted Image

SIDE BY SIDE COLLINGWOOD 2010 PREMIERS!


#10 Mr. St Kilda

    Brownlow Medalist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,907 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canberra
  • Club: St Kilda

Posted 28 June 2010 - 10:30 PM

Still, how can what Baker did to Johnson be worse then what Hall did to Staker?
Biggest load of shit.

Btw, Jesse Smith has just be placed long term injury list, meaning that his career is basically over.
Lenny Hayes- North Smith medalist 2010.

Saints for the premiership 2011!
Newcastle Knights!

GODdard

#11 Sean

    Brownlow Medalist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,973 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Werribee
  • Club: Western Bulldogs

Posted 28 June 2010 - 10:58 PM

four different offences against one single offence, no doubt they also wanted to make an example to stamp out "interfering with an injured player".

#12 Part2

    300 Gamer

  • VIP
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 424 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Club: Brisbane

Posted 28 June 2010 - 11:26 PM

There's no precedent for it though. They're trying to make a semi serious tribunal/appeals thing and this has already happened 4-5 times this year without any punishment.

It was pretty dog of him but if you think 12 weeks is reasonable you're out of your mind. They better appeal this because his season is basically over regardless. I guess the issue is that he'd miss the grand final if he appealed and lost but there's surely a way to bargain down a bit.
Posted Image

#13 woody

    Sidebottom <3

  • VIP
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,148 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Club: Collingwood

Posted 28 June 2010 - 11:32 PM

they could always tank the qualifying final and he'd be back for the grand final...
Ben Johnson, Rapist of Milne.


Posted Image



View Postdarcytrainor, on Sep 19 2009, 09:48 PM, said:

Remember when Woody said Steve Johnson did nothing in September :flick: As my avator says, he is Mr September :)

#14 aftertheFALLoutboy

    AFL Legend

  • Global Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,073 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tasmania
  • Club: North Melbourne

Posted 29 June 2010 - 02:25 AM

Wow..

#15 Matt_852

    Premiership Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,017 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Club: Carlton

Posted 29 June 2010 - 09:45 AM

View PostSean, on 28 June 2010 - 10:58 PM, said:

four different offences against one single offence, no doubt they also wanted to make an example to stamp out "interfering with an injured player".

As Sean said...

It was 4 different charges

If bazza hit staker 4 times... well staker would probably never get up again... but halls career would have been over!

7 weeks for one punch vs 3 weeks for one punch... probably fair...

It just seems worse as it was going on all day and they are all added together!



Posted Image






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

       
           
Copyright © Web Media Network 2012 · All rights reserved.